Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | dragon96's comments login

Genuine question: does anyone here actually want to query their database with natural language?


It's really helpful with MongoDB Query Language (also MQL). Document models without a rigid schema and a less intuitive API are where this stuff comes in real handy. MongoDB's GUI Compass already shipped a feature to generate queries and aggregation pipelines from natural language.


The people that hire data analysts do.


Is this to be trusted with things that have to be accurate such as a subpoena ?

Besides, I feel like a data analyst should be able to know what questions to ask, not just how to translate business requests to sql.


If you have to be accurate, "natural language" is not going to be the way to do it.


Someone made a puzzle about 404 pages once:

https://2020.teammatehunt.com/puzzles/puzzle-not-found

For those who aren't sure how to get started (ROT13): Svaq gur sbhe bu sbhe cntr svefg


> What’s deeply frustrating is that for more than a decade Sal Khan similarly said that the videos on his “Khan Academy” would revolutionize education, and they utterly failed to do so.

How does one determine whether an edtech startup like KA has succeeded or failed? As someone who has found KA useful at times, I don't understand where the author is coming from


It's a glorified youtube channel. Not a technology. That's most of the crux. It worked because Khan was early and made good content


The math exercises and lessons for kids has been very helpful preparing my young ones for common-core bullshit.


There is quite a bit more than a youtube channel. They have student tracking and tools for parents and teachers.


I recently heard someone say their favorite cure to writer's block is to read more and do research.

I found something profound about that. Writing is hard when you don't have anything to write about, and maybe there's something analogous to be said for goal setting.


As a fellow overthinker who also struggles to articulate my goals, I find it easier to think about incremental improvements than overarching goals.

For example, I want to become a better systems programmer, but I'm not really sure what to do with that desire. Goals are hard. But when I see C++ code, I know that I tremble at the sight of syntax I'm not familiar with, and that uncertainty is much easier to act on. I still won't "know" C++ in its entirety after an afternoon Googling session, but I definitely made some progress


Not exactly "engineering", but I might add an adjacent category of puzzle games that hurt your brain:

- Baba Is You

- Stephen's Sausage Roll

- Jelly no puzzle + Yugo puzzle (sequel)

- Braid

- Snakebird


Snakebird's trailer reminds me a lot of Room to Grow.


- Patrick's Parabox


> He refuses to engage earnestly with the “doomer” arguments. The same type of motivated reasoning could also be attributed to himself and Meta’s financial goals - it’s not a persuasive framing.

Exactly my thoughts too.

I don't agree with the Eliezer doomsday scenario either, but it's hard to be convinced by a scientist who refuses to engage in discussion about the flagged risks and instead panders to the public's fear of fear-mongering and power-seizing.


Though not quite as short, the Watson and Crick paper is another famously short paper:

https://dosequis.colorado.edu/Courses/MethodsLogic/papers/Wa...


Very cool. It is also quite well written and fairly easy to understand, modulo my weak biochem skillz


It could be obvious, but no need to be condescending about it.

There are many statements that fit into the category of "obvious once stated, but not obvious if you didn't consider the distinction to begin with".


As another data point, I've taken about 1.5 months for Part 1 of the book, chipping away at it for 1-2 hours on weekday mornings.


Consider applying for YC's first-ever Fall batch! Applications are open till Aug 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: