Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | dools's comments login

Using regulatory capture to further your own economic interests is still pro government, it's just that it's a government aimed at meeting the needs of a very small number of oligarchs rather than the majority of the population.

The idea that the government is "meddling" is naive and absurd. Government is why you have the ability to post that comment.


I don't like people who refer to government regulation as "nanny state policies".

"to address the concerns of a few"

lol


I love how libertarians are willing to use a communication network controlled by a billionaire oligarch who bought a presidency to further his business and personal ideological interests, but are worried about government overreach.


What's your concern with people choosing to use Starlink?


I'm not concerned that people are choosing to use it. I'm pointing out the hypocrisy of libertarianism.


In the 90’s, libertarians were against any consolidation of power (including corporations) that could infringe on individual rights. (This was roughly in Ron Paul’s time.)

That’s been replaced with corporate libertarians, which are against any government power that could infringe on the rights of corporations. See also Rand Paul, and the corporatist movement (which is sadly mainstream in the US, an offshoot of fascism, and essentially indistinguishable from modern libertarianism).

Anyway, they are many things, but I wouldn’t say they’re hypocritical.


It's massively hypocritical, even if the people don't realise it right away.

If you take libertarianism to its logical conclusion you wind up with feudalism, which is anything but free.

Whenever libertarians try to take their philosophy through to its logical conclusion in practice they just wind up reinventing government only worse (or reinventing banking only worse in the case of crypto).


Well, yeah, that’s the point of corporate libertarianism.

You can’t grant absolute power to corporations without also implementing feudalism.

Of course, there are voters that think they are voting for individual libertarianism, but are voting for corporate libertarianism instead.

(Similarly, there are progressives and moderates that end up voting for corporatists.)


Do you have any examples of libertarian candidates that did not support individual rights?


In the United States, the libertarian caucus in power since 2022 has several leaders that could be said to be against individual rights, especially if you look within the Free State movement, oddly enough. However, they narrowly avoided their candidacy in this last election. The whole thing is a mess.


I created a website like 10 years ago called birdmine that indexed every link you or one of your followers shared on Twitter, in a Solr search engine so you could search stuff that had been curated to an extent. It was pretty cool, I think I’m the only person that ever used it though.


Can Mike Judge please stop predicting everything?


I've been re-watching Silicon Valley the last few weeks and just watched the Nucleus live stream episode 2 days ago, pretty funny seeing it in real life.


"Puts data compression in a rear naked chokehold"


Reference for everyone else: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9IGvzb-KCpY


AI Guilfoyle and AI Dinesh


FTA "With over two million users, Keras has become a cornerstone of AI development, streamlining complex workflows and democratizing access to cutting-edge technology. It powers numerous applications at Google and across the world, from the Waymo autonomous cars, to your daily YouTube, Netflix, and Spotify recommendations."


sure -- all true in 2018; right about then pyTorch passed TensforFlow in the raw numbers of research papers using it.. grad students later make products and product decisions.. currently, pyTorch is far more popular, the bulk of that is with LLMs

source: pyTorch Foundation, news


The existence of a newer, hotter framework doesn't mean all legacy applications in the world instantly switch to it. Quite the opposite in fact.


I deleted Twitter as soon as musk took over because he’s a feudalist


I deleted Twitter back when they changed their community guidelines to carve out exemptions for important people (Trump as president), looks like that was 2019. Figured it was downhill from there...

https://blog.x.com/en_us/topics/company/2019/worldleaders201...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: