Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | dimkorf's comments login

$$$ It’s an exit strategy.


It can also be an advantageous continuation strategy. Being acquired doesn't necessarily mean giving up on the project, or losing ownership in it's future.

If you have a startup with a product, that product's path to further growth (and therefore its current and future value), can be expanded many times in the context of a family of synergistic products.

You can attempt to partner with existing synergistic products and companies. This can accelerate growth, but is also risky. Those other companies will likely see an opportunity to create their own competing version or your product.

That leaves creating synergistic products yourself, which may be a long road. Or being acquired by a synergistic company.

Either way, you end up owning a piece of a family of synergistic products, worth more together than apart, and with higher growth and stability prospects.

Whether its better to build out or get acquired depends on the risk vs. reward of the current context. If creating synergistic products reflects your strengths, and is open market territory, that is a great position to be in.

But if creating synergistic products is going to turn into an uphill battle of replacing products already on the market, then getting acquired may be a much faster safer higher value generating path.


I had briefly worked on a project using Green Arrays which implement Forth. Quite a different language when coming from the world of C like languages and such.

https://www.greenarraychips.com/


Are you able to say more about the project? Did you like working with their development board and GA144 chip?


> People want to participate, they want to be part of a conversation.

Are you potentially speaking for a vocal minority here that wants to be part of a conversation while ignoring the many than simply read (consume)?


Well, there is a reason most sites nowadays have comment section. The readers also read comments, even if they might only add to them rarely


Leaving comments is a different kind of participation than curating a personal website. The assertion originally under discussion here (a few posts back) is that most people don't care to curate their own personal website, or, really, any sort of distinguished online identity. I think that is true. Most people are on Facebook/Instagram/Nextdoor/whatever are doom scrolling it, not trying to become an influencer. The assortment of people leaving comments on NYT, Amazon reviews, or chattering on a forum somewhere, or whatever else, are doing just that, but not trying to drive traffic to their personal home page.


I don't think people do one thing. sometimes the read sometimes they like and sometimes they comment.


Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: