It appears that a moderator has edited the title and added the year 2017 to it while updating it. But it is a mystery where they picked "2017" from. It occurs nowhere on the page.
An update on this thread: Emailed the moderators today about the incorrect year in the title. After that, @dang fixed the title by removing " (2017)" from it.
Are we sure this isn't an April fools? I like the idea of having a guided install in addition to the standard one, but it doesn't seem quite in the spirit of the Arch Way.
I've lost many hours to OpenTTD, so great to see more people might find out about it now it's on Steam. To anyone who has only played single-player, I would recommend trying out one of the many servers - the massive networks some players make can be crazy.
Some servers restart automatically as soon as it gets to the year 2050, so by figuring out how long a game usually lasts and when the current game started you can make a guess as to when the next one will start.
The servers run by the OpenTTD reddit even have an online status website with game logs (https://ttdredd.it/). I tended to play there as whenever a game started, there were always a half-dozen players online.
Yeah, it's great. I'm using a Moto G3 from 2015 that continues to get weekly updates (although still on 17.1 at the moment) and I have no complaints. Only app with any issues is Firefox for Mobile - sometimes a single webpage will use up all the RAM and crash repeatedly - so I've changed to the stock browser.
Computerphile has a video showing a nice visual explanation of this technique, albeit for inserting values into a linked list rather than deleting them.
Apologies, I've edited it now. I did consider this initially, but the guidelines ask that the original title is used, and I wasn't sure if this fell under misleading.
I'd say it's "confusing" rather than "misleading"; this is because of lack of context. Reading "KDE Community Edition released" when you're on a Pinephone website is more meaningful than reading "KDE Community Edition released" on Hacker News, with only the pine64.org domain being available next to the link.
Because most of the routes have not been tested yet - all of them have been put together by volunteers during quarantine. And, from experience, even though they've been constructed from public footpaths, that's no guarantee of their quality. Paths can be fenced off by landowners, go through cattle fields or be outright missing.
Making all the routes available without at least a brief check could lead to less-experienced walkers getting lost or injured.
From experience they will and it’ll also be a foot deep in cow shit (I do a lot of walking in U.K.). That needs to be listed on the routes.
Common hazards and inconveniences such as flooding need to be listed. I had to Wade knee deep in slurry once where a river had flooded into a muck pile. I considered throwing my legs away with my shoes after that.
Cows yes, bulls no. There are exceptions but generally it's not legal to leave bulls alone without cows in fields that have public rights of way. We walk through fields with cows all the time, it can sometimes be uncomfortable if they come close but I've never felt in danger except when there was a bull. Two walkers have been killed by cows this year, although that's not typical.
