Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | chrramirez's comments login

With every new publication Wikileaks just confirms it's now just an agency of the Russian Goverment whose purpose it's to undermine the confidence of the american people in their institutions.


I'm from Nicaragua and this is new to me. But it does not surprise me. The ruling party have made billions from Venezuelan oil. They control the import, distribution and final sale of gas to customers. It's not in their interest to change the energy sources.

Internally there's have been development in renewal energy, but these have been done by investors close to the Government and they mostly sale each watt as it was produced from bunker. This is possible because they own all the energy business in the country.


It seems Nicaragua rejected the Paris agreement as it didn't go far enough [1]:

> As world leaders gathered in the French capital in November 2015 to reach an agreement on fighting climate change, Nicaragua's lead envoy explained to reporters that the country would not support the agreed-upon plan as it hinged on voluntary pledges and would not punish those who failed to meet them. That was simply not enough, Paul Oquist argued.

That leaves Syria, which may actually have other problems these days. The US seems to be pretty much alone in this.

[1] https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2017/05/31...


This kind of actions are important now more than ever for western societies. We have to remember that Russia is committed to destroy democratic institutions using fake news as one of its tools. Using fake news is an old trick to distort reality. In the pass it was done controlling state media or a good part of it. Now is making it into your Facebook feed.


If this results to be true, this could be one of the most expensive bugs in computer history.


Only, if you assume that those studies were of value without the error. obligatory xkcd: https://xkcd.com/1453/


For anyone who may want to know, prion diseases are sciencetific possible causes of a Zombie Apocalypse. That's why this new called my attention.


By "zombie apocalypse", you mean slow-walking infected, craving brains and infecting anyone they bite?

Or just, you know, a disease that kills you if you eat brains? Because that's kind of the exact opposite of what zombies do.


A prion that infected people rapidly, through saliva-to-blood contact, and had similar symptoms to rabies without the rapid death would be very similar to traditional zombie lore.

The protein would probably also have to effect the olfactory glands, creating an attraction to uninfected humans.


"Braaains... Eeat my braaains..."


It's hard to tell if you've been sincerely misled or if this is just a joke. Either way, though, it's not really plausible. The closest thing to a "zombie" that we get in nature are ants that are infected by Ophiocordyceps unilateralis. This fungus causes the infected ants to crawl to a fungus-friendly location on a leaf and remain there until the fungus kills it and produces more spores.


I think that Rabies was the inspiration for modern zombie stuff, actually.


There are actually a number of parasites that change the behavior of the host. Toxoplasma gondii makes mice try to get eaten by cats.


High percentages of humans carry that one. It studied once in a while whether it influences human behaviour [0].

I haven't found onen that discusses love of cats as a result, sadly.

[0] last section here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toxoplasma_gondii


In the I Am Legend novella (a big contributor to modern zombie), the infected are more like vampires and retain their intelligence. The book is notable for the primary theme it introduces, the otherness of the zombies (in earlier depictions they are largely undead plot devices)

Romero's Night of the Living Dead also plays with the otherness theme, but the dead are numb and more ghoulish than vampiric.

28 Days Later finally has something I would agree is rabies inspired. It probably contributed to the frantic behavior of zombies in several recent movies.


I believe Rabies inspired vampires as well:

from wsj

"The roots of the vampire myth stretch back nearly as far. Tales of vampire-like creatures, formerly dead humans who return to suck the blood of the living, date to at least the Greeks, before rumors of their profusion in Eastern Europe drifted westward to capture the popular imagination during the 1700s.

In its original imagining, though, the premodern vampire differed from today's in one crucial respect: His condition wasn't contagious. Vampires were the dead, returned to life; they could kill and did so with abandon. But their nocturnal depredations seldom served to create more of themselves.

All that changed in mid-19th century England—at the very moment when contagion was first becoming understood and when public alarm about rabies was at its historical apex. Despite the fact that Britons were far more likely to die from murder (let alone cholera) than from rabies, tales of fatal cases filled the newspapers during the 1830s. This, too, was when the lurid sexual dimension of rabies infection came to the fore, as medical reports began to stress the hypersexual behavior of some end-stage rabies patients. Dubious veterinary thinkers spread a theory that dogs could acquire rabies spontaneously as a result of forced celibacy.

Thus did rabies embody the two dark themes—fatal disease and carnal abandon—that underlay the burgeoning tradition of English horror tales. Britain's first popular vampire story was published in 1819 by John Polidori, formerly Lord Byron's personal physician. The sensation it caused was due largely to the fact that its vampire, a self-involved, aristocratic Lothario, distinctly resembled the author's erstwhile employer."

"The Plague Behind the Zombies The undead didn't always breed by biting. For that, the mythmakers needed rabies." http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB100014240527023033434045775189...


28 days later is inspired by the 1951 novel Day of the Triffids.


I don't think the monsters in it are.


Real life zombies (if they worked like the ones in movies) would all starve in the first month.

Imagine if lions eat a few kg of meat from an anteople, and then the rest of the antelope turned into another lion.


If zombies catch you and eat you, you're gone. If zombies catch you, bite you and you escape, you become a zombie. Generally it's not both at once.


xkcd estimates that in a similar case humans would survive 32 months: https://what-if.xkcd.com/105/


And he Xmen are a rough template outlining the future of human evolution.


Same happened to me, but the second dentist told I had 16 cavities. That was just 3-4 months after a dentist told I had none.


I felt something in my stomach when they implied that people who actually don't care about security are the ones who buys Android phones.


According to the WSJ, less than 10% of Android phones are encrypted.


I would like to add that maybe the problem are not the [micro|macro]-loans, but people. Loans are basic bricks for an economic development in any society. Sadly, they can't save a bad business from failure.

So my point is that maybe a poor borrower investing in a bad business will end up poorer. Other scenario, mentioned in the article, are poor people lending money for non productive expenses.

A basic financial advice applies here: Invest in a productive business and try not to borrow money for non productive expenses.


I think you basically reiterate the point here: if you are in poverty, you don't have enough money for basic necessities (read: non-productive expenses); therefore, you can choose to spend any extra money on those necessities, or go without.

In other words, microloans don't solve poverty.


I believe less' `:extend` pseudo-class is a better starting point to implemented scoped styles. See: http://lesscss.org/features/#extend-feature


Why this quote is the highest ranking comment is beyond me...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: