Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | brewdad's comments login

It's both. The class of younger generations who can afford to be homeowners is much smaller than it was when previous generations were that age. Sure, it was never easy for most 30 year olds to buy a home but now a 30 year old has had to have a LOT of things swing their way to even consider it.

Driver behaviors once the risk of being stopped by a police officer went away during the pandemic beg to differ. Many of those misbehaviors continue today as new habits even after enforcement has resumed to varying degrees.

Costs 20x as much as this robot. It does have the advantage of being used successfully once.

The drone used in that situation is the "Little Ripper Lifesaver" which supposedly sells for around $50k[1].

From TFA, the cost for the boat was around $12k. That means this is about 4x more expensive, not 20x. That doesn't include the droppable inflatable boat but that is probably not going to break the bank either.

1: https://www.insidehook.com/culture/little-ripper-rescue-dron...


No. The standard is zero. That's why the FAA investigates every crash or safety incident no matter how small. Realistically, the number will never be zero but if we don't put in the effort to improve constantly, safety will stagnate.

> The standard is zero.

This is simply incorrect. The FAA has a standard of getting the death rate below a certain figure per million flights, not zero.


Sure it will. Not immediately but gradually over time. If we decide it isn't worthwhile to prevent drowning deaths, educational and informational programs will go away. Novices won't fully understand the risks. Programs like my lakeside park has where free life jackets are available to borrow will disappear. People who might have considered swim lessons won't bother.

It also helps that there is a lack of seismic activity to push codes away from masonry buildings and towards materials that will survive an earthquake. Much of the west can’t build masonry because those buildings fail when the ground moves.

Chemtrails!


That is either patently untrue or there are a whole lot of loopholes. I used to live in Phoenix more than 20 years ago and had a lawn that matched anything you'd find in Chicago. I still have about a dozen friends living in the Phoenix metro and all of them have at least a patch of lawn, not to mention the grass areas maintained by the HOA.


I live in Phoenix now, and there are plenty of lawns.


A modern fab is basically a super, super clean warehouse. The equipment and layout can easily be changed up for a new generation of products.


Intel gets a sweet break on property taxes too, basically paying a flat fee per year. Otherwise, they could never afford the taxes on $20-40 billion of equipment in a single fab. The state makes up for it by taxing 20,000 well paid employees at a 10% income tax rate.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: