Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | bleuedejapan's comments login

He wouldn't own anything to his name. He would put his assets in an offshore trust.


Yeah, but if I had the kind of money he had, I would build a money bin on a hill and put 3 cubic acres of cash in it. Offshore accounts are just boring in comparison.


That's definitely fun. But not fiscally sound. And you don't become a billionaire by having fun, unfortunately.

I'd much rather to see someone putting crazy ideas into action having money...


Nah, you get to be a billionaire by being smarter than the smarties, tougher than the toughies, and making it on Square.


Considering that there will be a huge amount of unused, cheap real estate, and that only tech companies seem to be holding off the crisis, it is pretty much relevant - real estate will be a huge opportunity for tech.


Opportunity for what? Given the increase in WFH, tech companies are also using less real estate.


Opportunity for more datacenters? A lot of datacenters are built inside abandoned warehouses and other buildings: https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/analysis/recycled-buil...

These places tend to be connected to useful infrastructure like rail lines, and at least in the US, the internet kinda borrowed rail's right of way to lay fiber. Not sure how well connected malls are; they tend to be near highways so it might have a similar advantage?


Tech enabled homes, for example. Converting malls into homes, and managing building complexes using a tech stack...

If you really can't figure out one single use for cheap empty space, man, you need take a step back and just play around with your imagination a bit :)


I can think of plenty of uses of empty space. Housing is just one of them. What I didn't come up with was any need that tech companies might have. (I hadn't thought of datacenter, which another commenter mentioned, but I doubt the space opening up will be particularly useful for that.) Regardless, I've not heard of any tech companies needing huge amounts more space recently. Starting a new housing company to use this space might make sense, but I doubt any of the tech companies have any desire to become housing companies. I guess I could be wrong. If they do, I'll be removing any investments I might have with them, though.


One important aspect is that in Japan, there were no huge clusters in old folks homes.

There are many others, but this is one of the most important.


Any long lasting civilisation had people that were relatively clean and well fed - that's a very fundamental requirement for the civilisation to last long, after all!

You will find that even older civilisations, such as Egyptians, ancient Indians, Mesopotamians, etc. all had a relatively good nutrition.

Cleanliness here is extremely relative, though, as modern standards of cleanliness were revolutionised by fresh water supply and sewage systems. If any modern person visited an ancient city, they would have some trouble dealing with the stench.


The Romans are famous for their plumbing...


It's hard to tell how ubiquitous using a sewer for waste disposal rather than simply throwing it outside was, since a lot of accounts come from those with a vested interested in making Rome look good/bad. However, there were laws ordering compensation of those who the throwing of waste injured, so it was unlikely to be as sanitary as a modern city.


I an supprised that there could be much controversy over Roman sewers. There are preserved Roman streets across Europe and the sewers still exist today for us to inspect. The physical evidence is there in hundreds of sites. Of course their standards of cleanliness were different than ours. They had a system of collecting urine from each home so laundry services could wash clothes in pee! (It was a good source of ammonia.)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanitation_in_ancient_Rome


Portugal is on the top score list.


I upvoted it because I found it interesting, and didn't comment because I really have nothing to say on the matter.

Which dogma are you discussing?


How is that related to Google's efforts to curb unionization?


Maybe because OP believes that google employees don’t have the right or reason to unionize. Or because they believe employees should not have the power to dictate what projects a company undertakes on ethical grounds. If someone believes they should have such powers then maybe Google is the wrong place for them.


Italy's problem was never the Euro.

Italy is the largest political mess of Europe, and the amount of structural problems is staggering.

Its industries kept it running, and China's growth as a manufacturing centre, together with the accession of countries with less structural problems have taken a toll on the Italian industry.

If there was no Euro, Italy would still be ruined anyway.


Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: