Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | bewilderbeast's comments login


The heatsink cools the LM7805 power regulator, not the CPU. In the original 48k Spectrum, the heatsink was internal.


And if you use a modern switch-mode replacement, you don’t need a heat sink at all.

I know some folks like to put small heat sinks on the ULA though.


Soviet clones had ULAs built from individual 74xx ics. No need for heatsinks!


Excellent! I need to mess around with them at some point.


It already exists, though these guides are good to learn: LXC/LXD containers.


I have 2 issues with RCS:

1. Requires data connection, either WiFi or mobile data. SMS does not.

2. On Android, it goes through Google Messages. I don't trust Google.

So, I replaced Messages with another SMS app that doesn't spy on me and disabled RCS. If I wanted to do rich messaging through data connection, I would use Signal or similar.

So, RCS is not a replacement for SMS. It's just another IM protocol. And we have enough of those.

As for others replying through RCS, that's a failure of the messaging app, should recognize that the counterpart is SMS and reply in SMS. It's an attempt to force RCS...

SMS is for fast short messaging between mobile users, and that is its killer feature, it's universal. Every mobile phone supports it.

Signal dropping SMS support makes no difference for me, never used it for SMS, I used Signal for the secure conversations. Two different methods of contact.


"2. On Android, it goes through Google Messages. I don't trust Google.

So, I replaced Messages with another SMS app that doesn't spy on me and disabled RCS. If I wanted to do rich messaging through data connection, I would use Signal or similar."

3rd party SMS apps use a Google provided API to send and receive SMS messages on an operating system provided by Google. I'm not sure how you think using a 3rd party SMS app would be protecting you if Google cared about spying on your messages.

RCS through Google Messages is end to end encrypted while SMS is not, so you haven't eliminated Google in theory spying on your messages but you have assured that your carrier, the recipients carrier and whomever controls the OS and app on the destination device can potentially spy on your messages.


1. True RCS isn't supposed to go through internet, it's supposed to go through same way as SMS and voice calls (which is also a data connection, but specific to sms/rcs/voice)

2. That's not a requirement even though Google does their best to kill all alternative implementations. (Samsung had one, but Google paid them a lot of money to get rid of it. I have to admit I don't know who is left with their own RCS client)

> So, RCS is not a replacement for SMS.

It's 100% a replacement to SMS, it's literally defined in the same spec as SMS over LTE, as an upgrade to SMS. Though yeah Google made it, this... uh... thing. RCS is technically a federated standard, but Google killed every part of the federation and some parts of the standard.


RCS might be a federated standard, but before Google not even Verizon at AT&T wanted to federate.


Not sure why you'd say "not even Verizon". Verizon is literally the worst carrier worldwide (ok maybe after NTT) with regards to interoperability.


I think they're saying that the two biggest US carriers didn't want to interoperate.

Which is insane. An SMS replacement where Verizon and AT&T users cannot message each other is insane.


Yeah, that's exactly what I meant - if those two couldn't connect their systems, who can?


> So, I replaced Messages with another SMS app that doesn't spy on me and disabled RCS.

I think you know this based on the rest of your post but there is no “another SMS app that doesn’t spy on me”.


Why not? SMS apps no need internet access, so only one spying there can be carrier.


This is interesting, but no mention of how the hosts process these molecules. We all know that our body has problems processing artificial molecules (artificial sweeteners, etc).


What problem does the body have with breaking down artificial sweeteners?


Read the reviews:

https://www.amazon.com/Haribo-SUGAR-Classic-Gummi-Bears/prod...

And fwiw the whole point of "non-caloric" artificial sweeteners is that they're indigestible.

https://chriskresser.com/how-artificial-sweeteners-wreak-hav...


That sounds like the opposite of a problem in itself. The body digesting the drug before it can kill viruses would make it less useful.


He mentions it shortly, in the Build Quality paragraph.


My story:

In 1996 or 97, a friend brought me his Compaq Deskpro, the SCSI HDD had stopped working. No sound at all, dead. Tried everything, checked voltages, reconnected cables trying to clear any oxidation. Wouldn't spin at all. Well, called it a night.

Next day, decided to take it out of the chassis for a last test, connected outside. Not only it spun, it worked fine!!! WTH????

Well, into the chassis it went. Nothing. Dead. Whaa..??? Outside again, it worked. In the chassis, dead. Outside, worked. Scratched my head... With it working outside, just tried to place it on top of the chassis. It spun down and stopped. Took it away, it spun up. Got it close again to the chassis, it spun down again... Scratched my head again... Gave up, left it disconnected outside for the day.

Next day tried it again and this time it worked outside of and in the chassis... My thoughts? The chassis was magnetized or something...

Worked for a couple more years.


Perhaps a defect in a cable or connector such as a broken wire or a dry solder joint? These often cause problems that mysteriously appear or disappear as the cable is moved and the changing forces on the defect make and break the connection.


Nope, I tried everything, twisted the cables, etc. I even changed from power connector to another and changed SCSI cable. Outside it worked, inside didn't. Working perfectly outside, as soon it got close to the metal of the chassis it spun down, and as it got away from the metal it spun up.


Do you know about dosdude's Catalina patcher? And for previous versions? It's unofficial, so it might not suit you at all. It allows older hardware to run (with some caveats) newer macOS versions.

http://dosdude1.com/catalina/

Currently I have a 2009 MacBook Pro 5.1 running High Sierra.


Just an FYI, at least on previous patchers it turns off SIP. I’ve turned it back on and haven’t had an issue, but it does display a warning on boot that things may not work.



The Atari ST line of computers also use DB-19 connectors for their external ACSI interface, usually used for connecting hard disk drives. ACSI is Atari Computer Systems Interface, similar to SCSI.


Here's a photo of a 520. It's the "Hard Disk" port all the way on the right.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c0/Rear_por...

It was possible to hand-make a replacement for Atari's external floppy drive (round DIN connector on the right) because Atari wanted too much money for theirs. Having two floppies meant that compiling went from several disk-swaps to no-swap happiness.


The blitz copier used that, iirc. Fantastic noises a pair of floppy drives can make when running like crazy.


Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: