Slide the right side of the window off the screen, maybe? Dirty tricks are allowed.
I'm very aggressive with the "not interested" and "don't recommend this channel" buttons, and over time it does mostly get rid of the most obnoxious recs. Right now it's also not recommending much good stuff, either, so YMMV.
> Surprise, [your] ragebait [comment] is being downvoted.
This is how I believe it is meant to be read (aimed at the top comment.) And downvotes are exactly how they should be handled. I agree the ‘surprise’ muddles things a bit.
> But telling people to RTFM instead of giving the answer is rude now.
I wish the standard answer was linking to relevant documentation. Not quite "RTFM", since it can be hard to find the right part of the manual. But the reason humanity has gotten where it is is the scalable knowledge transmission of saying/writing something once and receiving it multiple times. It's embarrassing to regress from that.
This principle also works for security vulnerabilities in open source software, by the way. That is, the responsibility for preventing security exploits rests on the party who operates or deploys the software. Don't want the "risk" of open source? Feel free to use something more expensive. But it might be cheaper to pay the original developer for patches.
Whoever is responsible for putting the computer in a position where its decisions mattered. Whether that's the owner or their agent is a question for which we already have a couple centuries of mostly-adequate legal precedent.
Ok, but the "demand pull" for clothing is not really optional. I don't see how you can argue that the demand for used clothes is more damaging than the alternative, namely new clothes. The only complication is the layer of hiring someone else to buy them, but it's pretty likely they would do that for new clothes anyway, so... what's left to argue about?
> Skaters skate not gatekeep people, and were just hyped to skate with anyone
Is that not what makes them the true in-group? Especially the first two words. You can be "in" and not be a jerk, even eager to bring others in. In fact I'd recommend it.
Someone imitating someone else is generally considered and act of something like respect and flattery. They're doing it because they sincerely believe that the target of imitation is doing something right. It is a friendly and supportive act.
I'm not convinced. In particular I think sincerity or any sort of honest judgment is missing when talking about [non-]conformity rather than the merits of individual choices.
I'm very aggressive with the "not interested" and "don't recommend this channel" buttons, and over time it does mostly get rid of the most obnoxious recs. Right now it's also not recommending much good stuff, either, so YMMV.
reply