It is very difficult to misconfigure Wireguard -- there's just not that much to tune aside from MTU. We've had a 1 Gbps tunnel between AWS and OVH for years and it worked mostly fine, except for the handful of times OVH's DDOS mitigation kicked in and killed the tunnel. The issue is when you start wanting to go beyond 1 Gbps.
I think AWS will do 5 Gbps with a capable peer -- which is their limit for a single flow [1] -- but you might need to tell them first so they don't kill public networking on the instance though. I found that UDP iperf tests reliably got my instance's internet shut off, so keep that in mind. On the other hand, OVH will happily do 5-ish Gbps to/from my EC2 instance in a TCP iperf test, but won't tolerate more than 1 Gbps of inbound UDP. OVH support has indicated that this is expected, though they do not document that limitation and it seemed that both their support and network engineering people were themselves unaware of that limit until we complained. They don't seem to have the same limits on ESP, which is why I developed an interest in ipsec arcana.
As the other commenter said, perfect is the aspect, so the internal structure of an event, very important e.g. in Slavic languages. Your confusion leaves the door open to doubt on your actual knowledge of linguistics.
What "Turkish schools" call it is irrelevant, it adds "colour" to an event. Just because the events happen to be in the past, does not make the Inferential Mood a tense. An event can be in the past but factual.
A schoolteacher's goal is for their students to be able to write and speak an individual language. The goal of linguistics is to be able to understand and describe human language as a whole using a system of consistent rules and terminology. So, no, Turkish schoolteachers would not know the linguistics of Turkish better than linguists, just like a chef would not know the underlying chemistry of cooking better than a chemist.
> So, no, Turkish schoolteachers would not know the linguistics of Turkish better than linguists
Yes they do, because schoolteachers don't each invent their linguistic terminology as they go along in isolation, it's done by some regulatory governing body. Something like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkish_Language_Association. If anything, that's more centralized and controlled than what our countries have. So then it's not between the word of linguists on HN and some random primary school teacher in Turkey, but between the Turkish linguists deciding about their language and HN linguists.
And I am sure HN linguists think they know all the languages (programming or otherwise) better than anyone else, but somehow I doubt that.
I think you are both right but are talking about different things.
In elementary school in Canada, I was taught phonetics to help learn sounding words out. This was absolutely a government-sanctioned curriculum. I was taught that the sounds are categorized as either consonants or vowels. Every English speaker can confirm that of course this is correct.
But then you major in linguistics and discover that the elementary school definition of consonants and vowels is actually not quite right. And you can’t even categorize certain sounds well (such as the “w” in “we”, which is actually pronounced with a mostly open vocal tract).
Teaching X as a first language, teaching X as a second language and analysing X from the standpoint of linguistics are three different things/jobs/fields.
But we're talking about basic tenses here: https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Turkish/Reported_Past_Tense. This doesn't seem like obscure or scientific etymology tracking etc. And then invariable HN "linguists" pop up and say "actually, dear Turkish people, this is not a tense, it's a mood, you're all wrong it turns out".
It’s a sort of “ackchyually” distinction. In colloquial speech “tense” may refer to any grammatical form of a verb that implies a tense, even though the form may also express aspect and mood. In linguistics, as in any other academic field, people usually try to be more precise (https://wals.info/chapter/s7).
Studying linguistics is already confusing because the boundaries between morphology, syntax, semantics and pragmatics are not so clear in the first place, so getting rid of any ambiguity is important to linguists, but those things aren’t important to people who simply study the language to speak it.
Exactly, right? "We'll create a fast paced start-up to help Turkish people understand their own language". You gotta admire both the boldness and stupidity at the same time!
We know MacOS is Unix. We know Linux server runs most of the internet. We know Android is Linux. Thanks for your input.
We were obviously talking about the classic Linux Desktop distros, and based on the whole conversation you should know that. If ChromeOS and Android were categorized as Linux distros, then nobody would hate/love Linux Desktop per se.
We're obviously talking about Linux, not "Unix", and based on the whole conversation you should know that. Thanks for your input.
> If ChromeOS and Android
One is traditionally used on a laptop/desktop, one on a phone, not sure why you're conflating the two.
And the point is, if you are "just using a web browser", desktop linux has done this for decades. And Chrome OS is definitely a desktop linux distro, why do you not consider it to be one?
OS/2 Museum is one of the few sites that can feed my weird fascination with Netware and the old NT domain stuff, it’s great for getting an insight like you said in to the pre TCP/IP world.
> I literally just said he wasn’t just comparing Git Bash with Powershell though
That's great that you think that, maybe
delta_p_delta_x had a different takeaway. Why do you believe your opinion about what the cornerstone of the article is to be fact?
> If there’s one thing I can’t stand in IT, it’s people who think their personal preferences (or opinions) are equivalent to impartial facts.
I appreciate what you’re saying but the author literally named the software they were comparing. WSL was specifically mentioned, by name, in some examples.
That’s not subjective opinion of mine because it’s literally printed like that on their site (you can read it for yourself too. It’s the same site for everyone)
reply