Banning outright vs removing ads is an entirely different ballpark. Adults should have autonomy over their body so long as it does not infringe on others. It's not up to authorities to decide whether individuals trade long term health for short term enjoyment.
It certainly infringes on others in any country with a publicly funded health care system. The individual's bodily abuse is paid for by everybody else.
I was surprised to find out that VS code auto updates extensions by default. I suppose that beats never updating but I'd much prefer the tighter control as documented in the post.
I appreciated the README as written. I immediately understood what kind of environment the author intended this to be used in. A more formal explanation would have degraded the message. Vulgarity doesn't have to taken as judgemental, it can also be a good way to express empathy. The way I read it, the author's intent was the latter.
But skinny people get diabeties also...and if you follow a Twinkie diet and manage to keep your calories consistent and not gain weight you will be priming your body for obesity.
All those twinkies have triggered insulin, a side effect of which increases cell size, with significant impact on fat cells. If your fat cells are enlarged from insulin, then you are primed to become obese because your cells are ready to store more than someone who hasn’t been wrecking their body with insulin spikes from twinkies all day every day.
The Twinkie diet and similar diets are straw men. The fact that it is possible to consume high quantities of sugar and not gain weight is not surprising. The reality is that consumption of high sugar foods (especially high sugar low calorie like many sugary drinks) prime you to eat more. There is a causative relationship between consuming sugary foods and consuming too much. This can be overcome with unnatural levels of attention, however this is a fringe edge case and generally not relevant to discussing the broad impact of sugar in western diets.
Sounds like you're joking but I'll bite. Yes, it's different because doing what you suggest introduces barriers for people which make landing changes harder. By forcing people to conform to any style manually, especially by blocking them from landing important features and bug fixes due to styling preferences, you are building up opposition. It's just a bad experience for everybody involved.
In contrast, when you're promising that this exact problem won't happen anymore because an automatic tool will handle stylistic preference for your team, people are more willing to accept stylistic choices they (mildly) disagree with. Because on average the style is still better and on average everybody can move faster.
Agreed auto-correct is a big plus. Maybe a better way to phrase my question is this: Can auto-correct be implemented in pylint? Or does allowing configurations create too much of an obstacle?
In the ruby world for example, rubocop has an auto-correct feature. However it is only implemented for a subset of the style checks.
I know very little about stock trading. I shouldn't get in a world of financial pain if I don't trade on margin (Robinhood Gold Buying Power) and only transfer money I can afford to lose right?
That is treating Robinhood like a casino. I recognize I don't know what I'm doing at the casino. Therefore I don't use a credit card to buy casino chips and I have a hard stop-loss of a couple hundred bucks that's budgeted as entertainment money.
