Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more NoThisIsMe's comments login

Yes


That's not the question. The question is: If there are no marbles in a bag, are all marbles in the bag black?


Sounds weird when you ask the question that way, but if you ask "is there a non-black marble in the bag?" the answer is clearly no. So the question is more like: Should "all marbles in the bag are black" be exactly equal to "not(is there a non-black marble in the bag)".


I think you've misunderstood. The question you posed has an answer implied by the parent's question with n=1.


Looks much closer to Grain [1] than AssemblyScript

1. https://grain-lang.org/


That's not how the term is used in programming. Side effects may be intentional.

"Effects" (without the "side") usually means the effect is modeled as a type/value that is returned by the function.


> Which allows you to create images using the command line to build them up step-by-step.

I mean.. you can also do this with the Docker CLI right?


This would be an atypical use case for Vault AFAIK. My understanding is it's intended for sensitive config-like data, not sensitive app data.


I was checking out the docs for that and a few other similar solutions too. This is very true. Most of the secret managers are primarily intended for config-like data.


No, that's fine. I'd shy away from third party libs though, would probably use what Node.js provides out of the box. Or possibly something in the database, but I've never looked into that. Just don't roll your own crypto _library_, obviously.


Could you expand on this, or provide a source? I don't see how physics could yield a pure math result like that.


Other way around. Of course physics has nothing to do with whether a theorem is true or false - but it has everything to do with whether our universe satisfies that theorem's hypotheses.


I'm also struggling to make sense of what you're saying. Non-local measurement outcomes have very little to do with causality. Are you arguing against specific interpretations such as Bohmian mechanics, which require privileged space–time foliations?


This is testing the code that emits the SQL code, not the SQL code itself. Sometimes that's what you want, but it's not what OP asked for.


We do this in evil-mode too except it's bound to `g F`


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: