Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | LauraMedia's comments login

I generally like these tools, but I hate how they focus so much on one specific framework.

Tailwind is so general, why wouldn't you build a tool that works with Vue, that works with React, that works with Svelte?


On my work device, I have daily.dev installed. Every work day, I usually invest 15-20 minutes of catching up with recent news about all things dev and having it as the "new tab" helps me not forgetting about it.

Other than that, yeah, I usually CTRL+T and write right away.


I generally agree, the fact that the project relies on Google's internal steering is the much bigger factor in this to me.

There is no guarantee these 50 devs can actually focus on Flutter, instead they might get looped in in the internal race to AI products.


I mean we do actually have many years of real life experience at this point of how they perform in the real world.

I’ve never actually come across a better maintained project personally. It is incredibly thoughtfully developed with a high level of attention to detail who have successfully shipped a huge number of major improvements in ways that made sense.

There is a premise in the post that implies Flutter is poorly maintained and that’s just not a commonly held belief by the community at all.

As I hinted to in another comment the particular person behind this is a bit of an oddball and I think there may be other reasons that drove this decision in the first place in addition to the ones he gave in the post which for the record I’m sure there are some things he wishes were prioritised differently but this fork seems kind of very “him” rather than a popular position that people were begging for.


Could this be the random installers that were present in a folder of the repo? They had some C++ installers and I think a random Intel driver in there...


Most of the Android examples seem to be visually aligned to the 2018-ish Material 2 instead of the 2021 released Material 3 styling, which is a bummer, because it makes apps instantly look dated.

I think I would expect more from a 270€ pricing...


This is partially true! Our free components are Material 2 for Android. However, our paid components do use Material 3.

This is a big upgrade over what you get out of the box with React Native (still Material 2). Do you see a paid component that isn't Material 3?

Perhaps we should bump the free components to Material 3 as well.


Perhaps you should show the material 3 versions on your site directly, your example in this post shows a material 2 picker.

Furthermore, the pay wall is broken on Firefox Android, you can't see the entire preview since the bottom sheet isn't draggable: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1i9mp170LonL5hyRaxVdZ9IzCnVF...


Fair point, and thanks for flagging that bug! Will work to fix that.


So instead of just using a domain TXT record you're required to host a page and provide access to this file? Seems worse than how AtProto handle's this.


That is a wrong assumption.

First: You can easily host a million user handles on a JSON file without impact on the website, you cannot host a million user handles as TXT record.

Second: It is far easier to update a JSON file on disk than using an API to a specific domain registrar provider and change TXT records there.


The big problem with this is that content is harder and harder to find. Try to find a non-AI generated reply to a viral post on Twitter, you're looking at having to scroll down 5-6 1080p screens to finally get to some actual stuff people wrote.

The content you're enjoying today still exists, but it's a needle in a haystack of AI spam


We need a law or something that impose platforms to label any text that is only AI and text reworked by AI. And the possibility to filter both (we did this with industrial products). Then let humanity decide what it wants to feed itself with. I prefer to give up completely internet if it would only be filled with generated content. I gladly let it to people who enjoy that. Maybe a platform that label this and allows strict filtering (if possible) would be a success.


Can we do that for the mountains of ghost-written content and books as well?


My take is to explicitly mark a difference between human generated content and AI generated content. Not to label one superior to the other. It’s just to let people choose what they prefer. Like in chat bots for some companies they let you know you don’t talk to a human. Would you blindly accept a medical prescription generated by an AI ? Some people might even prefer the prescription made by the AI. All I’m saying is to inform people. After they make their choice.


This is the exact thing I keep telling people. It's all well and good saying human made content will still be around, but it will be covered in a tidal wave of cheaply generated AI hogwash.


Reminds me of shopping on <enter your favorite large ecommerce site>


The signal:noise ratio is decreasing because it’s easier to generate noise. I think paying for content (or content curation) is probably the way to curate high-signal information feeds.


Just like ads in your Netflix subscription, there is a large profit incentive to charge you for the "high-signal information feeds" and then... fill it with AI-generated content, which is much cheaper to offer.

¿Porqué no los dos?


I’m okay with AI being used in creative processes where the output is vetted by an actual human. If there’s AI generated content in Netflix ads, I’m guessing it’s of this type.

There’s also the option to move on from Netflix if you don’t like its content


I just have a Samba Server running as a second docker container and also expose a ytdl service for quick youtube -> server imports


I have been using Koel for a few months on my server. It was pretty good but not great. Nowadays I have Navidrome running on a docker service, along with a samba server, so I can easily add content and use any Jellyfin client I want (Like Symfonium on Android).


I think what would also be important is to select an existing frame and create additional views that fit the existing frame, that would definitely help creating a proper workflow


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: