They wanted to implement a typing system first so they could transfer complex types with a strict contract first, as large parts of DOM management would benefit enormously from that, and it would be far better to design an API around. This system has been stuck in different iterations for years.
You need to apply once a year and you need to be a maintainer of an active oss project for the oss license. From my experience they're very lenient in regards to what they consider active, but I don't think I'd jump trough the hoops if I didn't start using Rider with the student license.
Free for non-commercial offers a easy way to get people to use it and hopefully advocate for it at their jobs.
I did jump through the hoops every year and it's mostly fine, a 20m form filling exercise. I only had to explain one time that my project was still ongoing despite having a lot of seemingly automated commits.
While I can understand the part about hidden APIs, as they're in flux and experimental, the part that's weird about it to me is the "you can totally build it and share it just not on our marketplace" part. That just sounds to me like they're trying to bar their competitors from the VSCode Marketplace, making installing and updating a lot harder for users.
Even without the questionable legality of these individual certifications, we are afraid of large scale American SUVs spreading on the continent - it's not just the Cybertruck we do not want on our roads, it's also other dangerous stuff like the Dodge RAM.
Our road system, the education of our kids, it's all based on vehicle drivers being actually able to see children on the road, and for vehicles to actually fit in our roads. American SUVs/trucks fundamentally break that assumption and thus cause a danger to our roads.
Most of my other comments I was speaking in first person, in others I did not initially realize it wasn't as clear in some of them.
I also updated my bio here to reflect the product I am working for belongs to Automattic. Previously, it only mentioned the product which not everyone has to know belongs to Automattic.
Your employer has been served a cease and desist. Does your legal counsel know you are commenting on the legal matters on social media as an employee? This doesn’t seem like a wise position to put yourself or your employer in.
Also: “The reason WordPress sites don’t get hacked as much anymore is we work with hosts to block vulnerabilities at the network layer, […]” — as opposed to not putting the vulnerabilities in⁰ in the first place!
----
[0] Though I've not worked with WP for a long time. I'm told the quality control of the core product has improved a lot over the years and people still running old versions, and/or with unverified extensions, is a large part of the current level of issues.
> [...] and/or with unverified extensions, is a large part of the current level of issues
I'm occasionally forced to work with Wordpress, so I'm not an expert or anything, but that's my impression as well. Wordpress was designed for publishing articles but people want to use it as a foundation for building highly dynamic websites.
The paradox of these highly dynamic WP websites is that people usually try to build that way because they don't have the development expertise to make a custom solution, so they need lots of plugins to achieve what they want, but those plugins are often built to such poor quality and security standards that they really need to be reviewed before use, but to review them you need developer expertise.
I guess many webhosters run a WAF that blocks known WordPress exploits, protecting sites that don't update wordpress (quickly). And presumably wordpress.org somehow helps with configuring WAF rules for this.
Also looking myself for the last couple of months. No luck. 8 yrs exp, but generic full stack web experience in financial services (this might be my problem, having generic and common skills).
Could you elaborate on your exp? Wondering if you have specialist skills that are making you more in demand.
Honestly it's nothing too special. Boring enterprise .NET development, mostly focused on moving companies from old monolithic WinForms etc applications to modern stacks. Have been doing this for about 8 years.
Might be a localized thing though, I work and live in The Netherlands.
I’ve actually had a few recruiters reach out in the last few weeks. It’s nowhere near the daily calls I used to get, but it seems like there’s been a little bit of an uptick.
Yeah, I tried Tauri for a bit, and this was the primary issue I quickly found as well. Generally you use these kinds of tools to be able to easily do cross-platform UI. With Tauri every single OS you target will use a different underlying web browser engine, which means you'll still be running into many platform specific issues.
Especially webkitGTK is just a drama, it's barely able to do layout for basic tables in a performant manner.
In my experience in the current implementation Tauri is not ready for production. I've seen some preliminary work by the Tauri devs to investigate if they could use some standardized webview engine, but that's still very far away.
Zed team also being the creators of Electron should have been the best people for this. They themselves opted to write a new immediate mode UI library.
Yeah,atom too back in atom, they tried really hard to improve speed of atom by rendering in GPU as texture but before that properly implemented MS took over.
According to the article they want to ban encrypted chat services. This is of course the dumbest implementation, as (as the article points out), everyone who uses encrypted messaging for illegal purposes will just switch to another lesser known service.
The current active proposal for it is the Component Model: https://component-model.bytecodealliance.org/design/why-comp....
reply