Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | DXL's comments login

They could, but I assume SendGrid has more checks in place to prevent their users from sending unwanted emails. That way SendGrid has little risk of getting blacklisted, whereas a presumably uncontrolled service like Amazon's would.


Launchy is a similar app for Windows and Linux. It's not super great for finding and opening files, but it's a great timesaver for opening websites and applications, especially if you use your keyboard more than your muse (as I presume most hackers do).

http://www.launchy.net/


Interesting thing is that the latest version of Launchy works on OSX as well.


I use it to index my folders so I can get to them fast.


I believe I read sometime that all posts without a URL (i.e. "self" posts) get a discount of about 40%.


Build a comparison site or two: look for a market where affiliate programs are ubiquitous, structure the data and write a small application that helps customers decide. Get traffic using some basic SEO. Then pocket the commission from sales.

I did this for the personal savings market and "sim-only" mobile telephony subscriptions market in the Netherlands. It brings in a couple of hundred euros a month with only 1-2 hours of maintenance.


I wrote a script sometime ago, which sells about 4 copies a month for $25 each. The only way I marketed was by adding it to directories such as HotScripts. That will you give you some traffic if you're providing a solution in a field that's not highly competitive (a niche). You could try that.


Would you mind writing up a piece about your offline affiliate marketing experience, since it seems to be the most successful thing you've done?


I'll do a write up tomorrow, but I'm about to head to sleep. Been refreshing the statistics page and looking at ref urls for an hour and checking out some of these news sites I've never heard of!

email me at admin @ the linked website . com and I'll either email it to you or post it. The writeup will require quite a bit of time and tweaking :D


I always thought Google had a browser for the masses in mind with Chrome. Something that is easy to use, stable and fast: a good alternative for IE.

User scripts are something for power users, who will always prefer Firefox. Won't this create the risk that average users will accept installing all kinds of scripts without much regard for security implications? User scripts are a powerful yet low-threshold tool which could easily lend itself to purposes such as identity theft.


I'm a power user, but I use Chrome. I only fire up Firefox when I want to do something on a page that requires a Firefox extension (like HttpFox or MAFF).

[edit] I would almost appreciate a Chrome/Chromium extension that adds a 'open this page in X browser' option so that I can open it in Firefox when I need to without needing to copy over the URL manually.


> power users, who will always prefer Firefox

Why do you say that? Chrome has extension support, I'm not sure what unique feature Firefox will have left shortly.


Chrome extensions are OK, but they're severely limited compared to what you can pull off with FF extensions: http://conkeror.org used to be implemented using only the FF extension mechanism. Chromium extensions cannot alter built-in UI elements, so you're stuck with the standard WIMP UI. It's the only thing keeping me on the Gecko platform.


Out of curiosity, would this prevent a chrome equivalent of the SQLite manager?


You're right, I totally missed that announcement. That pretty much invalidates my whole point, sorry.


Sane mouse wheel scrolling, by the looks of it.


The redesigns look great, way to go ;)

If this gains a little traction, you might find your inbox full of requests for your services. (Edit: I missed the dark gray bar at the top of the page and now see that you're aiming for that. Good luck!)


Try the paper(s) named (Cumulative) Prospect Theory.


Prospect theory has been around for almost 30 years and has it's own problems. But of course the experimental results are illuminating..

A good summary of these findings can be found in http://www.hss.caltech.edu/~camerer/ribe239.pdf, the intro to Advances in Behavioral Economics (2003)


Additionally - I am not certain about the mentioned scientists' exact definition of loss - you might argue that since the damage was already done (Joe had already been charged), the 11 dollars was a gain rather than an adverted loss.


It's a loss, at least as far as your brain is concerned. (Logically, there's no real difference, the fact that it's already technically been incurred is pretty meaningless. (Also, you could argue that since he hadn't paid his credit card bill yet, it wasn't incurred yet.))

Your brain says "this is $11 that I wasn't supposed to spend that they took from me!" That's a loss. You want to get the money you lost due to their mistake back.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: