I was actually watching him do that and I was thinking the same thing. I don't know anything about developing but I was thinking that if the casing has even a tiny crack then the camera flash would ruin at least one photo.
The nice thing to do would be to send him a friendly email and tell him about it. Maybe he just doesn't realize it.
Really nice work. I love that the HD button stays active and loads all videos in HD. I also like the arrows shortcuts for next and previous video. Makes it much easier to skip tracks.
One minor recommendation: when the video is in full screen, the full screen arrows from the icon should be pointed inwards. Just being picky :)
For the searches that don't bring relevant results, I choose the "Give Feedback" option and report Bad Results. Then I add "!g" to the search and continue.
In case anyone is wondering what the hell this is:
The cache version saved by Google shows a single post in the tumblr blog. That post is with an image of a girl and you are asked to pay $3 to get a text file with the link to the girl's facebook page. Clearly spam.
The girl's facebook page is here: https://www.facebook.com/zlata.stefanova/photos (direct link to the photos because I know that is where you want to go :) (no, I did not pay $3, I just used google images)
Instead of wasting your time creating petitions to keep Google Reader open, I suggest you make a petition to make Google Reader open source. Google is going to close Reader either way so at least we'd haven a self hosted good alternative.
Every alternative I've seen so far in this hole topic(yes, all of them, I've tested all of them) is either poorly designed, bad UX, weird browser problems or trying too hard to be more then a RSS reader. Guess I'll just have to spend 2 days and build my own. Oh, well :)
It seems a bit harsh. The seller has no control over the chargebacks and you actually 'punish' the seller for them and not the buyer. Digital files chargebacks are more common than you think. How do you decide if the chargeback should receive a strike in the even that the buyer simple doesn't answer any contact requests(happened to me more then once). I've also had buyers lie about the purchase when in fact I had IP and email proof that they wore actually the ones buying but the chargeback was submitted(and approved) because they said they wore not the ones who made the transaction. Is anyone else using this 3 strike rule?
Does it have to be only the usual <a href="#">text</a> ?
What if I do this: <div link="#">text</div>
And then I use JavaScript to redirect, is it still considered a hyperlink?
Have I just found a loop hole? :)