Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | 75j's comments login

> I don't believe 75j is a sock-puppet account.

Thank you for the benefit of the doubt. I am not a sock puppet -- if you look at all those accounts you'll see that absolutely none have any overlap chronologically in terms of posting (well, until last night) or voting.

Sorry dang. But, I got deeply offended by being called a liar. I've posted projects on this current account that link to my real identity, so it was important I guess for me to clear my name. I'm also petty like that, but not normally to the extent that it causes problems. I think I've gotten one prior and much milder warning from you over the course of my time on HN. I'll go back to lurking for a while for now.


You do it. You're the one making the claim. I've been on HN like 8 years and I'm wondering what you mean too.


He won't. He is very afraid that his perception is indeed skewed and that he may actually learn something. Just like some other commenters in this branch.


As someone who has actually been here for like 8 years, I know better than to be baited into doing basic legwork research for the uninitiated.


Or could the females just be tending to wounds suffered by the most aggressive monkeys?


And yet I bet not too many women interact with you.


You can't attack people personally here, no matter wrong they are. When encountering a trainwreck of a thread, like this one, please resist the temptation to make it worse.

If you see an egregious comment, you can flag it by clicking on its timestamp to go to its page, then clicking 'flag' at the top.


What the hell is going on here? Why are you being downvoted for politely asking for clarification?


Because the question is extremely stupid, he should take an extra 10 seconds and it should be obvious


This breaks the HN guidelines about civility. We ban accounts that do that, so please don't do it.

You should also have better manners than to presuppose "he" when speaking of a fellow user.


In which sense is this "obvious", hubert123? I am really interested in what the comment meant by "restricted to humans". Try to be explicit in explaining.


The problem is obvious and needs no explanation. The post in question extrapolates that all women are gold diggers from a single study that purports to have found manipulative behavior in a few groups of monkeys.



Wow, I saw that this morning. I really wonder what effect it will have. For now the discussion will move to r/conspiracy, and possibly voat.co.

Will they ban r/conspiracy too? I'll delete my reddit account instantly and never visit the site again if they do.


What did you find difficult about Python 3?

I switched around 3.1, though granted I was still a novice programmer then and didn't have to port any legacy code. I had so many issues with Unicode in Python 2 (some may have been my own ignorance at the time, but with 3 a lot of those issues magically disappeared). Since text processing / NLP is my main focus, it was an easy decision to switch.


> Google pulled out of China because Gmail got hacked and Google assumed the hackers were affiliated with the Chinese government.

Then it seems pulling out was the right move. If Chinese citizens trusted that Google could secure their communications, and Google was then unable to, that put certain citizens at risk of persecution. Better to have them using a Chinese email provider where the default assumption is that everything is monitored, and then use the proper tools for actual private communication.


By this logic, should they pull out of the US too because Google (and Facebook both) has been completely pwned by the US government? Not meaning to be snide.


Not snide at all, and I agree.


Gmail was never hosted in china. When Google pulled out, it meant shitting down the china local search engine, with the one through HK eventually being blocked. Gmail wasn't even blocked in china until a couple of years ago.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: