Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | 2malaq's comments login

I guess the fuss is about Bolsonaro being depicted as a dictator in the media and as soon as Lula da Silva takes over, authoritarian measures such as these are pushed forward?


This was decided by a Brazilian Supreme Federal Court justice, not Lula da Silva. In fact, the justice was appointed in 2017. Also, the court upheld his decision 2 days ago. Your comment is disingenuous and making this a liberal vs conservative issue when it's actually about X not respecting Brazilian law.


Easy now. I'm only speculating on optics here.


Lots of people who were generally against war and violence went to war to fight Hitler voluntarily.


Bubbles, my friend.


Like what? I'm genuinely curious.


In this repo: furry. A coworker of mine reported another repository of this author (or another contributor?) for according to my coworker containing CP. Read issue 474 as well.


afaik it wasn't CP per se, it was images of botched circumcisions because he is very anticircumcision and had that as evidence for why. Still not appropriate to be anywhere near a git repo but the context is vastly different than cp. This doesn't change the recommendation to not touch this project with a 100 foot pole, but I think context is important.


People throwing a fit over some furry art hidden in the source code is dumb.

CP would be another story entirely but I need evidence of that before I act on it.


That's disappointing. I don't understand why the author had to include this, it's so unnecessary.


seems dumb to include, but it's their choice



Hardly reprehensible. Not a very "professional thing sure, I wouldn't trust a browser made by someone who puts porn in the source but its not like its a moral failing for what seems to be someone's side project

Edit: I see the accusations of containing cp, that's way more concerning and obvious why you didn't link it but you could have just said that.


Yeah, man. Honestly it's kind of a sexy picture that yiff png^0. I ain't into furry shit and I think it's weird, but that's a pretty sexy pose right there for people of a certain orientation.

And hilariously it ain't no different to stock-standard fare you see everyday on tabloids, TV, or Instagram! Like WTAF people having a moral-panic-meltdown over this shit? hahaha. Secretly Google just melting because somebody actually made a good Chrome fork. Tho I'm scared by even thinking of saying this I'll have to kiss goodbye to my GMail account, and they'll probably cancel all my accounts but still keep charging my credit card with no way to purge, right? Amiright, ABC.XYZ? Sergey, I thought we were freeeeeeens? :) heh.

0: https://github.com/Alex313031/thorium/blob/3759529384a18ae7c...

I mean, weird to include it in a GitHub repo, but not evil. The fact that some NPCs are falling over themselves to call this evil (while probably repressed-guilt-projectively retreating to their private stashus of furry-et-al pon when the sun rises) suggests there's "rotten" in the state of browser forking, methinks! hahahahaha :)


So you think TCR is the best one, but you haven't really tried the other ones? How can you know?


GP is clearly comparing their experience of FF+TCR with other browsers that implement vertical tabs (either natively or via extensions).

You're arguing against a strawman.


Well, if it says so on Wikipedia it must be true.


Exactly, right? Thanks for sayin' it! :)


That's rich coming from someone who posted the link to Wikipedia in the first place


Heh, I get what you mean. I'm not throwing out Wikipedia as a whole, but it does have a certain stance, you have to admit.


It's easy to feed current relevant data to ChatGPT.


They asked basically "pick me a bunch of stonks based on 10 criteria". They ended up with 38 stocks. If it's to do any selection at all we need to assume the potential possibilties were at least 100. So now you want text about 10 criteria x 100 stocks into one prompt.

You could split it into multiple prompts but that's not what they claimed to have done.


I like and use vim, but this is like saying BMW owners are better drivers.


It’s more like saying drivers of classic cars are better drivers. Which isn’t really a surprise. There are also plenty of great drivers who don’t drive classic cars


Needs a 2018 tag


> This might be targeting a minority of users - it’s design for power users. I’d expect HN to be supportive of this sort of design.

You'd expect.. But please listen.


Genuine question; If they're competitors, why is Vanguard Blackrock's biggest shareholder?[0] Is this the norm? Or is there a link between the two? (I don't know anything about the stock market)

[0] https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/BLK/holders?p=BLK


Vanguard is probably biggest shareholder of many companies, because the index funds it runs are huge.


The second largest shareholder of Blackrock, appears to be Blackrock, notice?

How do you think it is that Blackrock only owns 6.79% of Blackrock?

When you figure that out, you will have achieved enlightenment and be able to answer your original question.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: