Seeing the timeline of the transcript was interesting. He (Andrew) segmented the entire transcript into five minute segments, and then they start filling in. At first, I thought he was doing it all himself, but it seems like the whole point of segmenting it is so a lot of different people can do the transcription in parallel. So either he farmed it out to Amazon Turk, or he's got lots of college student friends.
I'm seeing these video interviews more and more; I really wish people would start posting transcripts alongside them. I don't want to devote 30-, 45-, 60-, however-many minutes to watching a video that may or may not be useful.
Andrew, fwiw, you have the highest ratio of useful-content / whiny-feedback out of any site that makes it to HN. It must be viscous preparing interesting interviews when you know you will catch the most flack for some tangential thing you "did".
P.S. This is in no way meant to slight the grandparent; I just keep seeing complaints in mixergy threads, even though I find the content most interesting (yes, the transcripts have been there for a while too :-)
I'm trying to use the feedback to improve my work. Before reading HN feedback, I didn't realize how important transcripts are to people. Now I try to add them to every interview.
Thanks to a few private message that I got from HN'ers, I even figured out how to use Mechanical Turk to get transcripts that are faster and cheaper than I can get anywhere else (though, admittedly it's not a perfect system).
I have been asking Google to remove Goodreads landing pages from search results on searches I run, as I find out that those pages are simply fakes for SEO. That has completely turned me off to actually using Goodreads, which was originally recommended to me by a good friend. A company has to be pretty nasty to get me to disregard a word-of-mouth recommendation by a friend.
Can you explain more? I ran a few searches where goodreads results show up and I have a hard time seeing how it's different from Amazon results. The page has useful information about the book, people's ratings and reviews, where I can buy it, etc. How are these "fakes"?
In my case, I run Google searches on people's names, and there is a link shown to a [person's name] review of [book] on Goodreads, only the person in question has never posted a review of that book! There is no such content by that person on Goodreads. I definitely know that in the case of my own name, which I check by ego-surfing once in a while to see what people are putting up on the Internet about me. I've seen some other spammers over the years that have been removed from the Google directory, and it looks like Goodreads will have to be the next site to get that treatment.
I was just beginning to warm up to Mixergy. I liked the Noah Kagan interview, which was also popular here. Gambit seemed like a really great company, and they both kept mentioned how much they liked the food at Chipotle.
Only a week later, Michael Arrington broke the story on how Gambit is one of the companies that got banned by Facebook for running scam offers.
Then, just this evening, I went to the new Chipotle restaurant that just opened in my town, and it sucks! Cold and dry meat, slopped together with some sauce and barely any fresh veggies.
I'm pretty disappointed in Andrew Warner, and I'm going back to staying away from his interviews. (Yes, I take my food pretty seriously)
Game recognizes game, and you're not recognizing Mixergy.
The point of the site is not to review local eats and treats joints, or recommend apps to you; that's the consumer side. Mixergy tells you about successful businesses, so you can .. be inspired by them.
I have never eaten at Chippotle but when I saw the interview I had to listen to it; there is a Chippotle in every major city, and if the Chippotle guys made it to Mixergy, I was sure I will get the inside scoop on how they got the ball rolling (it takes hell lot of effort to glean that information from the sterile content issued by a company's PR wing; Mixergy gives you the founders' voice(s).)
Your comment is making me think that maybe I should find a way to get more community input before doing my interviews so I can improve my research.
Having said that, on the day I did my interview, I don't think the ads that Gambit/Zynga/others ran were considered scams. Facebook itself didn't have a problem with them and respected investors like Fred Wilson didn't object either.
Even the HN community (which is quick to point out what I miss) didn't call the business a scam when I ran my interview. Perception in this industry changed after the TC article. Industry standards changed after that.
What's considered right in an industry often changes. If you listen to my interview with Matt Mullenweg, you'll hear him say that the way he promoted Wordpress in the early days might be considered spam today.
Industry standards change.
Give my work another try akamaka. I keep improving it based on feedback like yours.
Thanks for taking the time to reply. I guess it's a bit unfair for me to expect you to get at the personal motivations and philosophy of a startup founder, while at the same time grilling them on the ethics behind their business. I have to say I did enjoy the interview at the time, and watched the entire thing, and only afterwards did I question its value.
As for Chipotle, I am living pretty far from where it originated. Maybe the quality control is lower here. I'll give it another try when I'm in California.
His story out of college sounds just like mine. Mechanical engineer, disillusioned with the M.E. environment and excited about computers and the internet. Same time frame too. Glad to see he is successful with his current startup.
This looks like a ruby on rails application. The restful url's, the nginx as a webserver frontend and use of prototype javascript library is all very common for RoR.
And the transcript here: http://mixergy.etherpad.com/12