I don't think you understand what my reasoning is, because it would generally counsel against goto and manual memory management, which are harder tools for solving harder problems, and are usually unnecessary.
That you shouldn't restrict the use of certain tools/constructs/features in order to make areas like concurrency easier. Apparently you misunderstood my analogy. For one thing, it is an analogy, and not a statement you would use goto and manual memory management.
would generally counsel against goto and manual memory management, which are harder tools for solving harder problems,
That is a matter of scale. At small scales, "just using a goto" seems easier. It's only at larger scales that it becomes untenable spaghetti, so is harder. Herein is another analogy which can be related to concurrency and parallelism.
