> No. I'm saying that because the employees know all the salaries, the employer has less control.
How does the employer have less control when he is unilaterally deciding what the formula is and he can stonewall any request to discuss salary by hiding behind that formula?
"You know what, Dave, I know you want more money but I just decided to add a negative 'is disrepectful of superiors' factor' and your salary just went down $5k. Isn't transparency great?".
> How does the employer have less control when he is unilaterally deciding what the formula is and he can stonewall any request to discuss salary by hiding behind that formula?
Once everyone knows the employer is doing that kind of BS, they will go elsewhere, and the employer will be left with no employees.
Employment is not some kind of privilege we should be thankful for. Remember that.
> Employment is not some kind of privilege we should be thankful for. Remember that.
So someone is compelled to provide me with employment? By what force and why? Am I automatically entitled to employment at any company of my choosing? Can I decide that you, Grecy, are responsible for employing me?
The employment contract is a business arrangement. Describing it in such value-laden terms does a disservice to all parties.
One is employed presumably because the arrangement is mutually beneficial; if it stops being mutually beneficial the arrangement is renegotiated or terminated.
How does the employer have less control when he is unilaterally deciding what the formula is and he can stonewall any request to discuss salary by hiding behind that formula?
"You know what, Dave, I know you want more money but I just decided to add a negative 'is disrepectful of superiors' factor' and your salary just went down $5k. Isn't transparency great?".