I think you and I are talking about completely different things.
My post is in response to the notion that, given all the reporting you see in Western media re: China, the whole country looks like one gigantic shithole.
This perception is not entirely surprising. Even when one gets all of their news from the NYT (which as far as as bias and truthfulness goes, is pretty damn good), there is a systemic bias in getting Eastern news from Western sources by mere virtue of the fact that you'll never hear the good with the bad - you'll just hear the bad.
This isn't some evil conspiracy to slag China - it is this way for the same reason the 6 o'clock news is full of murders and robberies. Except, unlike the 6 o'clock news, you don't have real-life experience to temper the one-sidedness.
If you get all of your world view from local news sources, you'll have a very skewed world view, even if all of the content you consume is factual.
Right, I see what you mean. I was just pointing out if you only used Chinese media to learn about china, it would be the best place in the world since they cover up most of the bad, it's not like the west where our press is more than happy to air our dirty laundry.
I think it is a bit more nuanced than that. Yes, there is censorship in China, but not everything is censored equally. In particular, bribery cases usually get wide coverage in the media, even in China Daily. If my understanding is correct that's because the consensus is that the top brass is clean, it's just the "underlings" that can be bought. So, the leadership allows reporting of corruption (or even encourages it), as a means of keeping local officials in check. Because the central government is well aware of the problem and regards it as an existential threat, too.
Wow, the propaganda has worked really well on you. Bribery cases only get publicized when someone has another ax to grind with the official, because otherwise EVERYONE does it. The top brass is not clean at all, even Wen Jiaobao (just check out the NYT reporting about his family's wealth!) but they have enough guanxi to not get called out for it. That Bo Xilai was called out had more to do with him tapping Hu Jintao's phone than him being a corrupt general bad guy!
China's family-power politics is very entrenched by now, no one is really immune to it: if you try to be clean, you'll get kicked out because that would make you immune to the nuclear option (don't tell on me, and I won't tell on you). The government will give the public some bones whenever some official makes a serious mistake that can't be covered up, or otherwise someone who has more guanxi than the target has some score to settle.
My post is in response to the notion that, given all the reporting you see in Western media re: China, the whole country looks like one gigantic shithole.
This perception is not entirely surprising. Even when one gets all of their news from the NYT (which as far as as bias and truthfulness goes, is pretty damn good), there is a systemic bias in getting Eastern news from Western sources by mere virtue of the fact that you'll never hear the good with the bad - you'll just hear the bad.
This isn't some evil conspiracy to slag China - it is this way for the same reason the 6 o'clock news is full of murders and robberies. Except, unlike the 6 o'clock news, you don't have real-life experience to temper the one-sidedness.
If you get all of your world view from local news sources, you'll have a very skewed world view, even if all of the content you consume is factual.