Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

You are correct, my interpretation of "they could just retreat" is overly generous.

Being: "they have a choice to stop the bulk of ongoing costs of the war to Russian Federation at any moment, a choice that Ukraine does not have" - with the implicit assumption that the costs of the war to Russia are understood by everyone, and that the cost of withdrawal is significantly smaller.

Of course this ignores the cost of withdrawal to Putin, whose citizens (80% of whom want the war to continue) will have a lot of questions in that case.

Like, what did all the people die for. And why did you withdraw when we were winning, when 4 out 5 of us wanted the fight to go on.

Putin, like any dictator, is beholden to the overall vibe of his populace, because that's the only mandate to power that he actually has.

Democratically elected leaders have the power to decree "do as I say, that's the will of the people; elect someone else next time if you disagree".

Putin can't say that, because there are no elections in the social contract.

Russian leaders only leave the throne by abdication, coup, or death.

The only exception in their 850-year history was Nikita Khruschev, who was officially removed from power after he, himself, dismantled Stalin's cult of personality and brought on reforms that made such removal possible.

He was a Ukrainian.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: