On: Why the Guardian is no longer posting on X

[ywvcbk]

Were they? They [Guardian] are now claiming that both groups are being treated the same when they were clearly claiming that that wasn’t the case earlier?

Which exact groups they are talking about doesn’t really matter for this specific argument.

[tim333 → ywvcbk]

I don't think the Guardian article does claim that if you read it.

[aeternum → tim333]

The headline claims it, isn't that more important than the article claiming it?

[llamaimperative → aeternum]

The headline is being construed to claim what it does not.