Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

But perhaps it happened not out of the goodness of their hearts, but for unfathomable reasons like warding off antitrust lawsuits.



My guess would be that it was personally advocated for by someone who has enough influence within Apple to make it happen. Possibly someone on the hardware team, as I hear that the people developing the Apple Silicon processors run linux on them while they're in development.

This used to be one of the best things about Apple when Steve Jobs was still running the company: you'd get a bunch of features that a purely profit-focussed "rational business" would never approve, just because Steve wanted them. And I suspect Apple still has some of that culture.


On the internet it seems antitrust law can just be used to explain every. Antitrust actually has a pretty strict legal definition. And not a lot of thing fall into that. And if it Antitrust did apply, it would apply far more to the IPhone.

It would take an outright legal revolution in the definition of antitrust for this to be even a remote possibility, and frankly that is not happening.


Not all lawsuits need to be legitimate. They just need to be plausible and expensive to influence corporate decision-making.


Apple has plenty of money and lawyers. If they are 100% sure they win, they have no reason to be afraid of such a lawsuit.

By your logic, Apple could also be sued for not doing it. See how your logic doesn't add up?


Given that the boot liader design predates any antitrust action against this Apple, you'll have to find a different conspiracy theory.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: