On: Tim Sweeney: " Now Apple is demanding a 30% cut of...

[inerte]

Yes. It's a gift, not a donation. You can't write off $10 to the homeless. In the giver's mind it's a donation but not technically afaik.

[esquivalience → inerte]

The concept of 'gift' is inherent in the meaning of donation and has been understood that way for centuries: https://www.etymonline.com/word/donate#etymonline_v_31787

[3np → inerte]

Do you similarly hold that Nix v. Hedden decided whether we can refer to a tomatos as fruit or vegetable? Words can have different specific meaning in different specific contexts.

Even within the legal context of one country, you may for example be "a resident" by immigration law while "not a resident" by tax law, or vice-versa.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nix_v._Hedden

[jncfhnb → inerte]

And why are you asserting the technical tax framework is relevant here?