Yes there is. I could conclude that the test wasn't actually measuring intelligence, but just one component that when summed with other components displays intelligence; That is, if the test was purported to alone measure intelligence, it was a flawed assumption.
We used to measure intelligence with IQ tests, those are now known to largely be bunk. What's to say our other intelligence tests aren't similarly flawed?
We used to measure intelligence with IQ tests, those are now known to largely be bunk. What's to say our other intelligence tests aren't similarly flawed?