Not at all. If I understand correctly, the failure to synchronize was a fundamental flaw in the the networking code and had nothing to do with the payloads inside the networking code.
and it will drop the value field, throw an error, and quite possibly duplicate several type and half filled froms depending on how the error handling is done.
This article is basically admitting its cheaper to change the street names than unfux their buggy software, so something is up. what are the other options that meet that criteria?
The software glitch that was involved in 1,000 people being arrested had nothing to do with street names.
By this point, the flaws are pretty well-documented. If you find anything in the reports about handling of apostrophes, feel free to cite it.
The underlying communication protocol from node to node wasn't even SQL; it was an XML format called "Riposte." There was, perhaps, SQL involved in eventual account database updating, but issues had occurred in message transit even before that phase, and it's those issues that led to account reconciliation errors and (incorrect) charges of fraud on the part of the subpostmasters.
