Do you mean "in the path of totality" or "right under the center line?"
I live "in the path" and I've got friends nearby with rural spots to watch from.
Or: I can take a bit of a drive and find a spot to hang out pretty much directly under the center line, but they will be crowded and there isn't much of a practical way to avoid that.
The difference, according to maps, seems to be just a few seconds of total occlusion. Or is there more to it than that?
Aim for 80% inside the path. The couple extra seconds you'll gain from being dead center is usually not worth the hassle. clouds is your biggest enemy day of.
> I'm absolutely sure that it is completely coincidental.
In the same way that the city streets in DC coincidentally lay out to the mason's square and compass shape. The forfathers of this city were probably travellers from the future that knew the significance of this event, and laid out the entire city based on it. They just forgot to carry the one somewhere, and missed the alignment
But do you really think the rather small city of Norwalk, Ohio was planned for a nearly-perfect alignment for the center of the 2024 NA total eclipse? (Feel free to look on the eclipse map of your choice -- I'm not trying to deep-link or screenshot that, and it would be beneficial to the viewer to be able to pan around. And it's easy to find:
When panning around the eclipse map, Norwalk is about the only city directly on the center-line up North in Ohio.)
(That said: The alignment of Main Street to the center path of the 2024 eclipse in Norwalk might indeed be planned. Sandusky, Ohio is not far from there, and is said to have been designed around masonic symbols[a]. I don't discount the idea. And that's part of what makes it alluring to me, even though I tell myself that it must be a coincidence.)
I viewed a partial eclipse in 2017 in Columbus, Ohio, through heavy clouds and whatever random communal eclipse-viewing glasses that someone handed me.
It was weird and spectacular, and absolutely worth spending some time (in a tightly time-tracked job) to go outside and have a good long look at: There was absolutely a crescent-shaped sun visible behind those clouds, and that is a thing that I will never forget.
I don't think it was a ruined experience at all, though I certainly hope that this next eclipse is a lot better for whatever viewing-point I decide to choose and I understand that a cloudless sky is ideal.
I live "in the path" and I've got friends nearby with rural spots to watch from.
Or: I can take a bit of a drive and find a spot to hang out pretty much directly under the center line, but they will be crowded and there isn't much of a practical way to avoid that.
The difference, according to maps, seems to be just a few seconds of total occlusion. Or is there more to it than that?