Obviously not, it's near impossible to get into a discussion about Alan Turing without bringing up the way he was treated. However British money already features scientists (Turing, if selected, will replace Darwin) and this has far more to do with recognizing Turing's accomplishments than his treatment.
There are many people who think that it's a good idea to feature scientists on money and making that suggestion for US money isn't in anyway taking Turing's treatment lightly.
You honestly think that months after the pardon refusal this has more to do with recognizing his math/sci accomplishments than his treatment? Is the atlantic in the minority for mentioning "moral turpitude" before enigma?
If that's the case it seems like waiting a little while and letting the pardon refusal fade from recent memory would be a more effective advocacy tactic.
