Support for explicit sexual content in public schools is the minority opinion. As such, it is up to supporters to present the case for it's benefits, and the responsibility of parents who hold those views to expose their children to descriptions and depictions of sexual acts.
Support for sexual content in public schools K-6, perhaps. But these bans apply to high school as well.
I'm not going to dance this dance with you though. We both know that there are ulterior motives here that extend well beyond "sexual acts" and are absolutely about shaming or hiding the existence of homosexuals, trans people, etc. from teenagers for as long as possible. You're arguing from the position of their barely disguised pretense and literally no one actually believes that.
I'm not playing this obnoxious game where we all pretend that this pretense is real. I'm not even sure what is gained from playing these games outside of a cable news segment where you're obfuscating things to confuse stupid people. And besides, this was covered in my first comment anyway.
Support for explicit sexual content in public schools is the minority opinion. As such, it is up to supporters to present the case for it's benefits, and the responsibility of parents who hold those views to expose their children to descriptions and depictions of sexual acts.