What your missing is that to an outsider reading your posts, you're transparently indulging in edgy fantasies, and what you're proposing is actually a strategy to hurt people more effectively. So we tell you that what you're advocating for is gross.
You seem to have taken that as a sign we aren't smart enough to understand your point. That's not the right takeaway. If you think the accuracy of your statements is relevant to people's criticisms, you haven't understood them. If you think you have a good point that we haven't given full credence to, it's not our fault as an audience that you presented your ideas poorly.
Nothing I said was inaccurate, the 2015 breach was dissected and was followed by more signups by women filling in the gap.
I think there is something wrong with the consensus from you all.