I would alter your sentence -where do you think reality comes from - to
"Lets think where reality comes from."
Krish, was an interaction person -I sense, think-
Their arguments, always, was invitations.
Not statements -and personal (I, you, ..) things..-
They never personalized, project themself as a person.
So we could easily interact with our question,
from a one single meaning.
Reality perceived from a one single meaning-s-, by tribes, nations, people..
And yes, since you're the invitee, you could easily navigate your spark somewhere, by either with my spark or yours, or lets say ours ( since we interacted, communicate, it belongs us from now on )
This started to an interaction.
So, two things, perception and society.
And what we started to think is, they wouldn't start directly from reality.
Concepts like realty, god, .. are too big to start with.
I would alter your sentence -where do you think reality comes from - to "Lets think where reality comes from."
Krish, was an interaction person -I sense, think-
Their arguments, always, was invitations.
Not statements -and personal (I, you, ..) things..-
They never personalized, project themself as a person.
So we could easily interact with our question,
from a one single meaning.
Reality perceived from a one single meaning-s-, by tribes, nations, people..
And yes, since you're the invitee, you could easily navigate your spark somewhere, by either with my spark or yours, or lets say ours ( since we interacted, communicate, it belongs us from now on )
This started to an interaction. So, two things, perception and society.
And what we started to think is, they wouldn't start directly from reality. Concepts like realty, god, .. are too big to start with.