ISPs have been deployed for years without IPv4 or bad IPv4 (see this thread). And even not counting those ISPs there are countless more than would completely fall over if the major players stop announcing IPv6.
They just don't have the CGNAT capacity to run the internet without IPv6.
Strictly from the consumer perspective this means buggier, slower, and more expensive internet. Consumers don't care about bits, but their dollars he to buy the CGNAT and other crap.
And it'll only get more and more expensive (for the customers).
ISPs have been deployed for years without IPv4 or bad IPv4 (see this thread). And even not counting those ISPs there are countless more than would completely fall over if the major players stop announcing IPv6.
They just don't have the CGNAT capacity to run the internet without IPv6.
Strictly from the consumer perspective this means buggier, slower, and more expensive internet. Consumers don't care about bits, but their dollars he to buy the CGNAT and other crap.
And it'll only get more and more expensive (for the customers).