> Doubling down when you have been corrected adds only heat, not light.
All I've done is reported the facts, and, aside from hallucinating concepts in an example which didn't use them you've just insisted the facts aren't true.
I've provided examples like Ord and Eq, and you've provided nothing but denial. Nobody can do anything with that. The reason you find all those Concepts in the Standard Library with duck typing is that it's what Concepts do. If not for the duck typing they might as well just be comments.
Was that all you were getting at? Look at this fancy new comment syntax?
All I've done is reported the facts, and, aside from hallucinating concepts in an example which didn't use them you've just insisted the facts aren't true.
I've provided examples like Ord and Eq, and you've provided nothing but denial. Nobody can do anything with that. The reason you find all those Concepts in the Standard Library with duck typing is that it's what Concepts do. If not for the duck typing they might as well just be comments.
Was that all you were getting at? Look at this fancy new comment syntax?