The title and the article is fairly ambiguous, if you don't pay attention. Several sentences just say the generated faces are more trustworthy, and only further down in the article it is pointed out, that the generated pictures are rated as being more authentic pictures, than the real pictures.
It's poorly formulated and perhaps done so for clickbait, which makes it worse, since there are many ways to phrase it more clearly.
It's poorly formulated and perhaps done so for clickbait, which makes it worse, since there are many ways to phrase it more clearly.