Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

How can an endpoint, no matter how large that endpoint is, be considered to be a common carrier?

Justice Thomas is hardly a reliable source for making it so.




How is Facebook any more an "endpoint" than AT&T?


Facebook is just an endpoint on the internet. Nothing more.

AT&T is an ISP among other carrier things.

How can a server, or a set of servers be anything more than an endpoint?

That you would compare ATT and FB shows a remarkable misunderstanding of the internet and WWW.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: