Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The Japanese seem to have a head start on this process. Article from 2016.

https://www.miningweekly.com/article/over-40-minerals-and-me...

Last year, researchers at the Japan Atomic Energy Agency’s Rokkasho Fusion Institute revealed that they had developed a new way of extracting lithium from seawater. This involves dialysis. It employs a dialysis cell containing a membrane made from a superconducting material. Lithium is the only ion in the seawater that can pass through the membrane. It moves from the negative electrode side of the cell to the positive electrode side. They reported that the system displayed good energy efficiency and that it would be easy to scale it up. However, they also cautioned that the process is years away from being commercialized.




We're nowhere near materials that superconduct above water's freezing point (even salt water); how could this work?


The answer seems to be that it is a misnomer or at least bad choice of name. They talk about (lithium) ionic superconductors at each occurence of the term superconductor which makes me think that they actually mean materials that only let lithium ions through but not others (because this is how their device actually works).

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001191641... (Open Access)


There are many criteria by which superconductors are classified.

Superconductor material classes include chemical elements (e.g. mercury or lead), alloys (such as niobium–titanium, germanium–niobium, and niobium nitride), ceramics (YBCO and magnesium diboride), superconducting pnictides (like fluorine-doped LaOFeAs) or organic superconductors (fullerenes and carbon nanotubes; though perhaps these examples should be included among the chemical elements, as they are composed entirely of carbon).[12][13]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconductivity




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: