Actually in the US it's explicitly not the job of government, hence the bill of rights.
Individuals, and collections thereof, however, are free to censor whomever they want. This misguided idea that your protection from government censorship affects your contractual agreement with me needs to stop.
> Actually in the US it's explicitly not the job of government, hence the bill of rights.
You need to read my comment again.
In the US, it is NOBODY'S JOB.
> This misguided idea that your protection from government censorship affects your contractual agreement with me needs to stop.
Repeat after me: "I am not Google. I am not Google. I am not Google. I don't affect the lives of billions of people. I don't affect the lives of billions of people."
I did. Are you suggesting that legally, Google is unable to do this, or that ethically there is some principle that says that large collections of people should have fewer rights than individuals? And therefore that the government should restrict the speech rights of those groups?
Individuals, and collections thereof, however, are free to censor whomever they want. This misguided idea that your protection from government censorship affects your contractual agreement with me needs to stop.