On: Interfaces Generally Belong with Users

[enriquto]

> It goes against all OOP and modularity principles.

Sounds good to me, then!

[LessDmesg → enriquto]

I hate the flavour of OOP present in C++/Java/C# as much as the next man, but the principles are sound. Defining the interface at the user side is like a conflict of interest, like a kangaroo court. It's just bad architecture.

[sagichmal → LessDmesg]

> Defining the interface at the user side is like a conflict of interest, like a kangaroo court. It's just bad architecture.

You're wrong.