I'm pretty out of my depth here, but I thought the deferred loads latency was part of the 12% gained from dynamic scheduling, not the 88% that the Mill claims to tackle with its phasing thing. In that case, 8% doesn't sound measly at all.
But like I said, I wouldn't be surprised if I'm just not understanding what I'm reading/watching.
But like I said, I wouldn't be surprised if I'm just not understanding what I'm reading/watching.