According to the comments I'm the only one who liked the article. I've had a lot of math but never any signal processing (i.e. FT) and never really got to wrap my head around the concept of a FT. I realize that the person here is making a lot of simplifications but you've gotta start from somewhere. Great job on making an article that is both engaging but still "mathy".
Can't please everyone I guess ... especially not on HN.
The article is all right. I would have liked to see somewhere a mention of the fact that the transform being described moves between the time and frequency domains, and that the relationship is reciprocal.
Can't please everyone I guess ... especially not on HN.