Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Yea, this could mean that a WU employee explained to a customer why they were being refused service, and explained how they'd have to redo their request in order to send money.

The prosecution will spin it as in cahoots, when it could have just been good customer service explaining a bunch of stupid rules.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: