I'm friends with Peter. I don't think he'd mind me saying:
He didn't set out to build the empire that he did--he really wanted independence for one person (and it just turned out that what we built was so good that lots of people wanted it). He doesn't want to be in the limelight. So, as the article mentioned, he's chosen to focus on philanthropy and art and just watches our business from afar. He's a smart, great guy.
Peter Norton wrote some pretty tight assembly, I learned a lot about data structures and coding from prying apart the Norton Utilities one-by-one. Super stuff, last but not least because it brought a fairly powerful command line to DOS which was in dire need of some tools.
In the pre-internet era, I remember going to my local library and checking out the programmer's guide.. probably six times before I got my own copy for a christmas present later that year. When you couldn't just stack overflow your problem, books like that were gold. I'd probably have ended my early teenage obsession at 14 if I hadn't had access to it.
> He didn't set out to build the empire that he did -- he really wanted independence for one person (and it just turned out that what we built was so good that lots of people wanted it)
Regardless of his original motives, he must really be proud that a huge bunch of people would agree that in the MS DOS world and the world thereafter, he was a big hero who produced terrific utilities and terrific books...stuff that many people learning about computers were utterly fascinated by and could in turn use that knowledge to create their own cool stuff. Where would people have been with a creaky OS but without UnErase, Speed Disk, Disk Doctor, Disk Editor, Ghost and many others? :)
If you're in touch with him, do convey the wishes and regards from a whole community of hackers. :)
How come Norton Commander wasn't even mentioned? Brilliant, simple, very practical two-panel file manager with a shell prompt. I still use its GNU clone, Midnight Commander, up until today.
Agreed. At the time I was with Symantec it was bandied about that the cost of having him on the box was becoming a pain point. They had been trying to phase his image out for years.
> With his first wife, Norton accumulated one of the largest modern contemporary art collections in the United States.[30] Many of the pieces are on loan all over the world at any given time, and many were on view at Symantec Corporation. The foundation and the Norton Family Office are located in Santa Monica. ARTnews magazine regularly lists Norton among the world's top 200 collectors.
I remember buying Norton Utilities on a 5" "flippy" disk. It was like a vinyl record in that you flipped it over to access side 2. And Norton Editor was a godsend in the days of Edlin and Wordstar.
Probably Peter Norton's Assembly Language Book for the IBMPC. Ray Duncan's Advanced MSDOS was another essential. If you want a bit more esoteric, The Undocumented PC by Frank Van Gilluwe.
I could name a few more but I probably shouldn't be admitting that I'm pulling these off my shelves :-)
Ah thank you! I currently have the MS-DOS Encyclopedia (not the first first edition https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/larryosterman/2004/06/14/do... which was apparently a little _too_ detailed) which is pretty informative. I'll track down your recommendations though.
Oh. Another one is Norton's Programmer's Guide to the IBMPC. Finally, one other book is Brown & Kyle's PC Interrupts.
I sold a shareware DOS file management program written in assembler (the file was about 30kb) for a number of years which is why I have all this obscure stuff :-)
He didn't set out to build the empire that he did--he really wanted independence for one person (and it just turned out that what we built was so good that lots of people wanted it). He doesn't want to be in the limelight. So, as the article mentioned, he's chosen to focus on philanthropy and art and just watches our business from afar. He's a smart, great guy.